vol. 1, issue 1


Truth: 

the Final Frontier?

 

 

I have a hunch that many Christians are afraid of truth. Strange – ironic, actually – in that we believe that we have the Truth. You would think that Christians, of all people, should be overjoyed at the discovery of any truth, no matter where or how it is discovered. If I am correct, the implications are horrific. If someone is afraid of truth (or information, which purports to be the same thing), then my guess would be that they don’t really believe that what they believe is the truth. Of course, the next question is what, then, do they think they believe?

This is be no means a new phenomenon. If I recall correctly, the Roman Church condemned Copernicus for daring to suggest that the Earth was not the center of the universe (and really, what difference did it make to the Church?). Many Christians still condemn scientists (those evil people), archeologists, and whoever else is out there looking for truth.

I mean, isn’t looking for truth a good thing? Isn’t it a better thing than just amassing wealth or becoming successful? And what if they actually discover some truth; isn’t that a good thing? The problem, however is that science, philosophy and religion are all intertwined. That means that the discovery of truth ("What do you mean, the Earth revolves around the Sun?") does impact how we view things. That’s what truth does. (That’s why the world rejects Jesus.) So why should Christians fear truth?

If we really have the Truth (with a capital "T"), shouldn’t we do everything we can to encourage others to look for it, even a little piece of it? Shouldn’t we even help them find it? Do we think that somehow God is up in Heaven fretting because some evolutionist may discover a little bit of truth? I don’t think so. My God, and my faith in God, is bigger than all that.


The one thing that I am convinced of at this point 

is that I am wrong, at least partially, about nearly 

everything I believe.


So what would happen if someone was able to prove (as much as we can prove anything) that man ascended (I would think of it as a step up) from apes. Would that affect your faith in God? It really shouldn’t, unless your faith is in something less than Jesus. What if some scholar was able to convince you that the Bible as we know it today does contain some errors? Again, your faith should not be shaken, unless your faith is in something less than God. That was part of the Pharisees' problem. ("Ye search the scriptures . . ." John 5:39)

The one thing that I am convinced of at this point is that I am wrong, at least partially, about nearly everything I believe. I may be close about some things, but close doesn’t count when you are talking about either perfection or truth. I know, because the Bible tells me so, that we know only in part, and we see as if through a glass darkly. I believe that. I can accept it as truth when God tells me, "My ways are not your ways, and my thoughts are not your thoughts." So why then, should I allow myself to believe that any of my beliefs are 100% absolute truth? Wouldn’t that be in itself a denial that what the Bible has just told me is true?

I definitely believe that there is an indisputable, immutable truth. I also believe that until we get to Heaven, we only have limited access to or understanding of that truth. I imagine that when we arrive in Heaven, we will be able to tell the newcomers by the bruises on their foreheads from slapping themselves as they say, "So that’s what that meant!"

What concerns me is that perhaps many Christians have put their faith in something less than in Jesus. If that is the case, there may be some shocks at J(udgment) Day. But again, the Bible has promised us this.

Since the near beginning of time, man has tried to find truth somewhere besides through relationship with God. Adam and Eve were the first when they went for the fruit. Religious dogma and tradition has often been mistaken for truth, possibly because dogma is easier to control, and you can use it as a standard by which to judge others (as if we were ever called to do that). How can you judge others if you don’t have complete access to truth yourself?


But would I give my life for my  

theological beliefs?   Probably not.


Martin Luther had to fight to get the Bible into the hands of the people, as the Roman Church was afraid of what would happen if they couldn’t control what passed for truth. More recently doctrines such as dispensationalism and issues like inerrancy have caused great turmoil in the Church as various individuals and groups have made their particular viewpoint the standard by which to judge the remainder of the Church. Why should anyone think that they could possibly have the corner on the truth market? Could they, perhaps, be an exception to "seeing in part?"

I fear there are many Christians out there who don’t even realize that they have not built their faith with Christ as the foundation, but rather have built on sand – there may be some large rocks mixed in, but it is sand nonetheless. For there is no other Rock but Christ. Dogmas, traditions, creeds and systematic theologies, even if 99% accurate, are not a substitute for Jesus. We are not to lean on our own understanding. So then why do we?

I have a pretty good theology that I have put together over the last 40 years. It’s as consistent as possible with the whole of the Bible, and I believe what I believe because I think it is more true than anything else out there (why would I believe anything I did not think was true?). But would I give my life for my theological beliefs? Probably not. Would I die for my freedom to search for truth? Possibly. Would I die in obedience to Christ? I can only hope so.

Joan of Arc is one of my heroes. She died because she refused to recant her belief that she could find truth through her relationship with God (yeah, I know there were saints involved – I have opinions but I’m not about to die over this one yet). In Jeremiah 31 God tells His people of a time where His people will know the truth, because they will know God. God doesn’t say we will know the truth because of the Westminster Confession, or even the Apostles’ Creed. We know truth because we know God himself. I happen to believe that the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds are about as true as anything we know, but I am glad that I don’t have to rest my faith on them. My creed, my statement of my beliefs, is not my foundation – my foundation, and my faith, is Christ alone, for "I know in whom I have believed." (2 Timothy 1:12)

So I love truth searches. I enjoy reading books on scientific theory, history, archeology – especially when they bring religion into it. I enjoy movies dealing with philosophical themes, and love listening to "secular" music. Have you ever noticed how much of postmodern music deals with God? These are the sounds and thoughts of people looking for truth. This is the culture that we are supposed to be invading and challenging. They are actually doing our job. It seems to be that it should be the Church that should be building a culture that will draw others in. The world is looking for truth and we’re supposed to have that. However, at this point the Western post-modern culture is searching for truth, and it’s scaring the heck out of the church because they don’t follow our rules in looking for it.

But what should truth care about cultural rules? If we indeed have the truth, what do we have to fear from anything? Why not subject our truth to their inspection? If it fails to hold up, then perhaps we need to do some more seeking ourselves.

The western, neo-evangelical church has been so pragmatic – in a modernistic, business-model sort of way, geared toward winning intellectual assent of Christianity – that it has all but killed off community. We have in effect presented to the world information that we expect them to believe, in spite of the fact that the church doesn’t act like it believes it! What we need is to refocus on community and re-learn how to live out our faith; this is the true pragmatism. The world simply wants to know if it works. I think often the church is afraid to try it themselves.

We know now, after a couple of hundred years of modernism, that our objective, scientific truth will only stand until something new replaces it. The world is not impressed with logical proofs but no power. If we tell them, "My God is better than your god," we had darn well better be ready to prove it, with faith and with power and with changed lives and a working community. They want to see a greatly reduced divorce rate. They want to see lives not controlled by materialism and greed. They will know we are Christians only by our love. What they really want to see is Jesus, in us. This takes faith – not in our dogma and theological systems – but true faith in a God who is the Truth.

So let them dig up dinosaur bones. Let them map genes and clone things (they will do it anyway). Let them theorize about expanding universes and the origins of life. Then let’s help them interpret what they find. They might actually discover life, and we may learn more about God in the process.

Alden Swan


Copyright © 2000 Alden Swan, All Rights Reserved.  Reproduction of this article, in whole or in part, is expressly forbidden without prior written permission.